Friday 17 April 2020

Antti Tuomainen. The Mine. (Orenda Books, 2016)



In their review of The Mine, Helsingin Sanomat characterises Antti Tuomainen (1971-) as “an internationally known Finnish crime writer, special because he is not actually a crime writer” (Link: https://www.hs.fi/kulttuuri/kirja-arvostelu/art-2000002848674.html). Tuomainen himself tells us that his primary interest in all his novels is to explore human relationships, especially within a family. He seeks moments when people are faced with extreme choices with significant consequences and aims to show characters making choices that we, in our normal lives, would not make. He avoids questions about his status as the “king of Helsinki noir.” In his interview on Aamun kirja programme (link:  http://areena.yle.fi/1-3029755) Tuomainen comes across as likeable and sympathetic, thoughtful and measured. He published his first crime novel Tappaja, toivoakseni (The Killer, I Wish) in 2006. His third novel The Healer (original Parantaja, 2010, English edition 2013) won the Annual Clue Award in 2011 and his books are sold in 27 countries.

In his fifth novel The Mine (2016, original Kaivos published in 2015), Tuomainen tells a story about a father and son. He emphasises this twice on Aamun kirja. He wanted to create “changed men;” to write about men at turning points in their lives, facing questions not only about right and wrong as could be expected in a crime novel, but also about what a family is and what it means to be a father or a son. The Mine is a sentimental story about the return of an absent father, wanting to make amends, and he does so by helping his journalist son to tackle a political scandal and a bunch of bad guys in the snow-flurries of northern Finland.

Tuomainen is good at describing cold and snow throughout, a handy talent for a Nordic crime writer to have. In places there is such a wealth of explanatory detail it feels like Tuomainen struggles with exposition and piles it on a page a little too generously. The choice of a distancing third-person narrative for the view point of the father in contrast to the first person narrative for the son makes the shifts between these viewpoints clear, but it also makes the character of the father sound pompous and awkward.

The son Janne receives an anonymous email about environmental crimes committed at a nickel mine in the far north of Finland and the questionable dealings of the mining company with the Finnish government. The events take place in meticulously described Helsinki with trips to the frozen north. Part of this plot are a dead, possibly murdered, maverick journalist (p53-4) whose notes are jealously guarded by a feisty daughter, who is a member of a radical environmental campaign group (p124). There is much potential here for a topical political thriller: big evil business, a local community dependent on it, a national industry at stake. When Janne’s father Emil, an international assassin, appears to have been hired to kill some of the mining company’s board, crime quite cleverly becomes a family affair and the two plot lines begin to intermingle.

The story of the family and the crime story do not gel. They jostle along uncomfortably. The family story becomes uneventful and heavy-handed; the crime story becomes confusing with undeveloped characters killed for no apparent reason. Both narrative strands are valid, but the attempt to mash them together does a significant disservice to both. When they come together at the end, when the father steps in to save his son (very useful to have a contract killer for a father) the ending feels flat. The bad guys are dispatched promptly and quite effortlessly (p180), the family is reunited without any apparent feelings of bitterness or even awkwardness (p255).

The problem lies perhaps in Tuomainen’s declared key interest: character development. Emil returns to Finland after 30 years abroad (p11) having abandoned his wife and 1-year-old Janne (p41) without a word of farewell. He is now disillusioned with his killing career (p29) and has a sentimental obsession with his son (p178, 185, 187, 189). He also wants to return to his wife. It is not explored what has brought him to this frame of mind. There would be much dramatic potential here for drama and conflicting emotions. Tuomainen does little with it: Emil does not change in the course of the story, he doggedly sticks to his maudling longing for his family. His family’s reaction is equally disappointing. Janne’s response is “Welcome back ... I suppose” (p62). Janne's attention is torn between the crime he is investigating and his father’s return, this makes his character stutter between these two main plot interests. His own broken marriage and relationship with his little daughter become almost footnotes (pp19-20, 39 169). Emil is also forgiven and welcomed back by his abandoned wife Leena with open arms (p121, 137, 202). It looks like her life never moved on during the three decades Emil was away.

The Mine is a curious crime story, because there is a distinct lack of moral tension or moral ambiguity. The father is not really a bad man, he only ever murdered people who deserved to be murdered (p188). The mining company is not really evil; the CEO is a good man (p18, 241), there were just some greedy board members who were summarily removed by Emil in an obscure internal power struggle. There is no punishment for the wicked: the killer is never caught. The evil big business is never prosecuted; the worst they experience is a mild threat of exposure in the media. “Nobody has won – not even the author of the exposé” (p246), Janne concludes in his final blog entry on the matter. The real punch line of the novel is the final chapter of the family reunion. This seems to suggest that neither legal nor social justice, nor the environment matter. The only thing that does matter is the nuclear family: “family is the most important thing we have” (p187) (although Janne’s own wife and daughter are left aside).

In The Mine, Antti Tuomainen is just too nice: the story is killed by the sweet sentimentality of the author. Tuomainen is an interesting writer and clearly ambitious in the way he uses the crime story formula. I doubt The Mine is his best book.